It seems that the Battle Royale mode multiplayer Fortnite, Turning into an independent game, confidently claims to the title of the most popular entertainment of the year in this genre. The number of users of the game is growing at a frantic speed that overshadows success even Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds.
Fortnite Battle Royale Started on September 26, that is, less than two months ago, and the number of players, according to the official Twitter, has already exceeded the mark of twenty million people. And this means that the creation Epic Games is in great demand than Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds from Bluehole, Inspiring American developers for this project (17 million copies sold since March 2017).
We Just Passed 20 Million Players Across All of Fortnite Since Launch! Thanks from the Bottom of Oour . Pic.Twitter.COM/LUVV5VB7WJ
– Fortnite (@Fortnitegame) NOVEMBER 6, 2017
It is easy to guess where Fortnite Battle Royale Such impressive numbers. The game is distributed by a freeathy model and is available on PC, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One. With all this, the number of one -time users in Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds nevertheless noticeably higher – more than two million versus 800 thousand people. Yes, and income at Bluehole also higher – for the pleasure to kill or be killed in PUBG More than 17 million people have already given thirty bucks in the “early access” per copy.
November 7, 2017 Guerrilla Games advises how to approach Horizon: Zero Dawn – The Frozen Wilds
November 7, 2017 Creative Assembly hints at the fast news about Total War: Rome II
Fortnite
PUBG: BattleGrounds
The best comments
For the pleasure of killing or being killed in PUBG in "early access", more than 17 million people have already given thirty bucks per copy.
Here’s what advertising casinosnotongamcare.co.uk streamers do.
Taking into account the PUBG and the intensity of general dissatisfaction at the time of the release of Fortnite, the predictable result, especially once many streamers having the main audience in PUBG do not disdain to devote half the “screen time”
Anyway, having lowered the discussion “Realism against cartoon” Fortnite bypassing PUBG according to many parameters. Good optimization, juicy and clear picture, a small map promotes the “movement”, and most importantly, the presence of construction and destruction solves the indigenous problems of the Battle Royale genre by 99%. In PUBG, two fall into the neighboring houses and for ten minutes they sit listening to each other and study the pixels in the windows for movement, because they are suicidized with unrequinctive doors and loses the one who has less patience. In Fortnite, a grenade/pair clip of a firearm will take you out with the house, or the enemy will simply build a ladder on your roof and fall on your head. Also at the end of the game, in PUBG the team occupies a single house in a clean field in the zone and wins, in Fortnite under the phrase “what to build on” the teams pounds their own mansions and you will not be soaked in the clean field if you do not screw up.
Of course, many differences are based on style and theme, but after 150 hours I can’t return in both games in PUBG, although I believe that the game has great potential and respect those who chose it. Fortnite is felt too fun and dynamic too much. We played with friends in PUBG for months, but after a week Fortnite is too dull all this sitting in the corners, races in search of a car, scraping each room, lying under the trees on the hills, and in the top 5 death from Saiga in the toilet or from a muffled sniper from the bushes despite the fact that we prefer “realism” almost all.
Of course, no one prevents both games from existing and playing at the same time, this is all personal choice. But at the moment, it seems that some of the outfits are polished by the popularity of popularity with an ax, while others on the machine in two shifts, and I’m not sure that the promised large PUBG update will change the situation.
And then everyone is surprised and scolded by the companies for the fact that they do not want to make a single, but they want to do multiplayer services.
I can imagine how, for example, the Secretary General of the PRC is furious and threatens to ban the Internet even stronger, because the Queen of Great Britain banged him into the head with Aimhak.
Yes.Now make the game paid at least for the same price as Pubg and see how many people will remain.
PUBG objectively fun game. There are situations from which you really can laugh, Viva La Dirt League has an excellent sketch show that clearly draws game situations.
https: // www.YouTube.COM/Watch?V = KD9SMQP7BDE
And what will you go away, tell the truth? Or are these schoolchildren cheaters who have already been banned or whom the mother did not give to Pubg?
Ash a stump of fortnight as a game more “licked” in every sense, and diverse, and it is stupid to deny, and if it had come out before Pubg, even in a paid form, it would have been sold more, but the fact is that they were late, and they will never be like a simulator of the lags on a PC, if it were paid, I think even a couple of lamas, alas, alas those who were the first, not the one who is better.
I played Fornite and did not play Pubg. But in my opinion, the fact that you describe as the pros of the first and the minuses of the second (okrom optimization) – it depends on the tastes and point of view. But the very presence of such differences – in any case, it is plus, regardless of the final choice, due to the availability of this choice.
The numbers, of course, are considerable, but … one -time online is much more indicative, as it seems to me. I will not argue that Batle Royal Fordnight has her own circle of amateurs, but she is far from Pabg.
Uuu, who was bombing and the mother again did not give money to the computer better. Looks like now you have to collect from school dinners, and here is bombing
